Live
Test: 15% of Americans say they would work for AI bossTechCrunch AIBitboard version of Tetris AIarXivThe Price of Meaning: Why Every Semantic Memory System ForgetsarXivWhen Verification Hurts: Asymmetric Effects of Multi-Agent Feedback in Logic Proof TutoringarXivFormalProofBench: Can Models Write Graduate Level Math Proofs That Are Formally Verified?arXivNeuro-Symbolic Learning for Predictive Process Monitoring via Two-Stage Logic Tensor Networks with Rule PruningarXivQuantification of Credal Uncertainty: A Distance-Based ApproacharXivAutoMS: Multi-Agent Evolutionary Search for Cross-Physics Inverse Microstructure DesignarXivMediHive: A Decentralized Agent Collective for Medical ReasoningarXivMultiverse: Language-Conditioned Multi-Game Level Blending via Shared RepresentationarXivTransparency as Architecture: Structural Compliance Gaps in EU AI Act Article 50 IIarXivCompliance-Aware Predictive Process Monitoring: A Neuro-Symbolic ApproacharXivConcerning Uncertainty -- A Systematic Survey of Uncertainty-Aware XAIarXivdaVinci-LLM:Towards the Science of PretrainingarXivAligning LLMs with Graph Neural Solvers for Combinatorial OptimizationarXivTest: 15% of Americans say they would work for AI bossTechCrunch AIBitboard version of Tetris AIarXivThe Price of Meaning: Why Every Semantic Memory System ForgetsarXivWhen Verification Hurts: Asymmetric Effects of Multi-Agent Feedback in Logic Proof TutoringarXivFormalProofBench: Can Models Write Graduate Level Math Proofs That Are Formally Verified?arXivNeuro-Symbolic Learning for Predictive Process Monitoring via Two-Stage Logic Tensor Networks with Rule PruningarXivQuantification of Credal Uncertainty: A Distance-Based ApproacharXivAutoMS: Multi-Agent Evolutionary Search for Cross-Physics Inverse Microstructure DesignarXivMediHive: A Decentralized Agent Collective for Medical ReasoningarXivMultiverse: Language-Conditioned Multi-Game Level Blending via Shared RepresentationarXivTransparency as Architecture: Structural Compliance Gaps in EU AI Act Article 50 IIarXivCompliance-Aware Predictive Process Monitoring: A Neuro-Symbolic ApproacharXivConcerning Uncertainty -- A Systematic Survey of Uncertainty-Aware XAIarXivdaVinci-LLM:Towards the Science of PretrainingarXivAligning LLMs with Graph Neural Solvers for Combinatorial OptimizationarXiv

Compliance-Aware Predictive Process Monitoring: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach

arXivMarch 31, 202610 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2603.26948v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing approaches for predictive process monitoring are sub-symbolic, meaning that they learn correlations between descriptive features and a target feature fully based on data, e.g., predicting the surgical needs of a patient based on historical events and biometrics. However, such approaches fail to incorporate domain-specific process constraints (knowledge), e.g., surgery can only be planned if the patient was released more than a week ago, limiting the adherence to compliance and providing less accurate predictions. In this paper, we presen — Fabrizio De Santis, Gyunam Park, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Existing approaches for predictive process monitoring are sub-symbolic, meaning that they learn correlations between descriptive features and a target feature fully based on data, e.g., predicting the surgical needs of a patient based on historical events and biometrics. However, such approaches fail to incorporate domain-specific process constraints (knowledge), e.g., surgery can only be planned if the patient was released more than a week ago, limiting the adherence to compliance and providing less accurate predictions. In this paper, we present a neuro-symbolic approach for predictive process monitoring, leveraging Logic Tensor Networks (LTNs) to inject process knowledge into predictive models. The proposed approach follows a structured pipeline consisting of four key stages: 1) feature extraction; 2) rule extraction; 3) knowledge base creation; and 4) knowledge injection. Our evaluation shows that, in addition to learning the process constraints, the neuro-symbolic model also achieves better performance, demonstrating higher compliance and improved accuracy compared to baseline approaches across all compliance-aware experiments.

Comments: Accepted CAiSE 2026

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.26948 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2603.26948v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26948

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Fabrizio De Santis [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:37:13 UTC (333 KB)

Original source

arXiv

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

researchpaperarxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
Compliance-…researchpaperarxivaiartificial-…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 342 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers