The Price of Meaning: Why Every Semantic Memory System Forgets
arXiv:2603.27116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Every major AI memory system in production today organises information by meaning. That organisation enables generalisation, analogy, and conceptual retrieval -- but it comes at a price. We prove that the same geometric structure enabling semantic generalisation makes interference, forgetting, and false recall inescapable. We formalise this tradeoff for \textit{semantically continuous kernel-threshold memories}: systems whose retrieval score is a monotone function of an inner product in a semantic feature space with finite local intrinsic dimensi — Sambartha Ray Barman, Andrey Starenky, Sofia Bodnar, Nikhil Narasimhan, Ashwin Gopinath
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Every major AI memory system in production today organises information by meaning. That organisation enables generalisation, analogy, and conceptual retrieval -- but it comes at a price. We prove that the same geometric structure enabling semantic generalisation makes interference, forgetting, and false recall inescapable. We formalise this tradeoff for \textit{semantically continuous kernel-threshold memories}: systems whose retrieval score is a monotone function of an inner product in a semantic feature space with finite local intrinsic dimension. Within this class we derive four results: (1) semantically useful representations have finite effective rank; (2) finite local dimension implies positive competitor mass in retrieval neighbourhoods; (3) under growing memory, retention decays to zero, yielding power-law forgetting curves under power-law arrival statistics; (4) for associative lures satisfying a $\delta$-convexity condition, false recall cannot be eliminated by threshold tuning. We test these predictions across five architectures: vector retrieval, graph memory, attention-based context, BM25 filesystem retrieval, and parametric memory. Pure semantic systems express the vulnerability directly as forgetting and false recall. Reasoning-augmented systems partially override these symptoms but convert graceful degradation into catastrophic failure. Systems that escape interference entirely do so by sacrificing semantic generalisation. The price of meaning is interference, and no architecture we tested avoids paying it.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27116 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.27116v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27116
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Ashwin Gopinath [view email] [v1] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 04:01:59 UTC (521 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
AI Regulation Insights
As Canada s trusted partner in AI advancement, Vector Institute continues to bridge cutting-edge research with practical industry applications through strategic initiatives. In response to the rapidly evolving AI regulatory landscape, [ ] The post AI Regulation Insights appeared first on Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence .

Thought Cloning: Teaching AI to Think Like Humans for Better Decision-Making
New research from Vector Faculty Member Jeff Clune and Vector Graduate Student Shengran Hu introduces a groundbreaking approach to imitation learning that could potentially revolutionize how we train AI agents. [ ] The post Thought Cloning: Teaching AI to Think Like Humans for Better Decision-Making appeared first on Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence .

Recommender Systems: Where Academia Meets Industry
Authors: Shaina Raza, Amirmohammad Kazemeini This blog is based on the survey paper “A Comprehensive Review of Recommender Systems.” Recommender Systems (RS) blend artificial intelligence (AI) and personalization in a [ ] The post Recommender Systems: Where Academia Meets Industry appeared first on Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence .
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

Quantum computers might crack today's encryption far sooner than we thought
According to a study by engineers at Caltech and the UC Department of Physics, quantum computers do not need to be nearly as powerful as previously believed to crack the most advanced cryptographic technologies. The research claims that Shor's algorithm could break RSA public-key encryption using quantum computers with just... Read Entire Article


Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!