🎲 Aleam — A True Random Number Generator built for AI.
<p><a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F19sgacx14pz8vxa1uoab.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"><img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F19sgacx14pz8vxa1uoab.jpg" alt=" " width="800" height="884"></a><br> Here's the truth:</p> <p>Python's <code>random</code> is actually <strong>pseudo-random</strong>. </p> <p>Aleam delivers <strong>real randomness</strong> — straight from your system, hashed with BLAKE2s. </p> <p>No tricks. No fakes. Just like nature intended.</p> <p>✨ What it can do:</p> <p>• 15+ statistic
Here's the truth:
Python's random is actually pseudo-random.
Aleam delivers real randomness — straight from your system, hashed with BLAKE2s.
No tricks. No fakes. Just like nature intended.
✨ What it can do:
• 15+ statistical distributions
• Works with PyTorch, TensorFlow, JAX, CuPy
• GPU acceleration with CUDA
• 81 tests passing — 100% production ready
📦 Install it:
pip install aleam
🇧🇩 Built in Bangladesh. Open source. For everyone.
🚀 Want true randomness in your project? Start today.
Github:https://github.com/fardinsabid/aleam PYPI:https://pypi.org/project/aleam/
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
open sourceproductgithub
The Fallback That Never Fires
<p>Your agent hits a rate limit. The fallback logic kicks in, picks an alternative model. Everything should be fine.</p> <p>Except the request still goes to the original model. And gets rate-limited again. And again. Forever.</p> <h2> The Setup </h2> <p>When your primary model returns 429:</p> <ol> <li>Fallback logic detects rate_limit_error</li> <li>Selects next model in the fallback chain</li> <li>Retries with the fallback model</li> <li>User never notices</li> </ol> <p>OpenClaw has had model fallback chains for months, and they generally work well.</p> <h2> The Override </h2> <p><a href="https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/issues/59213" rel="noopener noreferrer">Issue #59213</a> exposes a subtle timing problem. Between steps 2 and 3, there is another system: <strong>session model recon
🌪️ Proof of Work: The To-Do List of Infinite Regret
<p>**</p> <h2> What I Built </h2> <p>**<br> I built a productivity app for people who hate being productive. Proof of Work is a digital psychological experiment that turns simple task management into a high-stakes gamble.</p> <p>The gimmick? You cannot "check off" a task. To complete anything (e.g., "Buy Milk"), you must first win a game of Minesweeper on an Expert-level grid (30x16 with 99 mines). If you hit a mine, the Hydra Engine triggers: your task isn't cleared—it duplicates 20 times. Now you have to buy milk 21 times. It is a functional implementation of a "short-circuit" for the human brain.</p> <p>Demo<br> </p> <div class="crayons-card c-embed text-styles text-styles--secondary"> <div class="c-embed__content"> <div class="c-embed__body flex items-center justify-between"> <a href="
How We Built an EdTech Platform That Scaled to 250K Daily Users
<p>In 18 months, we took an EdTech platform from a founder's wireframe to 250,000 daily active users. The app handles 2,000+ concurrent video streams, processes 50,000 quiz submissions per hour, and runs on a $4,200/month infrastructure bill.</p> <p>Here's what we built, what broke, and what we'd do differently.</p> <h2> The Problem We Were Solving </h2> <p>The founder wanted CA exam preparation for 500K+ students. Existing platforms were either expensive (Unacademy at $200+/year) or had poor UX. The brief: live classes, recorded lectures, AI-powered quizzes, and doubt resolution — all at a $50/year price point.</p> <p>Budget: $40K for MVP. Timeline: 12 weeks.</p> <h2> The Architecture That Made It Work </h2> <p>We didn't overthink the stack. We picked proven tools and focused on shipping.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products
WaterNSW Adopts Generative AI For Applications - Let's Data Science
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMikgFBVV95cUxNVkdHejJmSW85UzVuSEJnRUpBbHpORklieU1QeGU2cS1qZjRhdGZKZG55VHRQN2p4Sk9QNk12LTE5aXpaaEFxc0Nvb0xpcjJkRXlFeDc4T3hLQkdBOEltNFUzeWRZWkVjZ2RxR0FlQS1qZWg4cFRRZmVhbXBPbXFIUHZ5bzVCSUFXMEVCclFjR2RSUQ?oc=5" target="_blank">WaterNSW Adopts Generative AI For Applications</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Let's Data Science</font>
CSU survey: Most students, faculty regularly use AI tools - Action News Now
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi1gFBVV95cUxQdlViT09kNE5YNWw4bXlFOHdlMnRQNnB1aFVzVUM2bkxkSUdZeHZUMGRmR3B2OTdrMGVZYndobHFpRXVNbi05blh3Tmt2MFlobTBJTzNab0ZXUFNfQmRQVEs1WmZ6UUQtUTZmTGxYVGJlRmwyRVNUVE83X1JRWDJvRHY1TGE1NEpWU21hNUhUSlI4eTJXbzVNaS1xb2Y3bTJHWVRyRThMRGlwcS13bG1TSW5uZlEycUY2R3F0T3ZjTWZvOEpCSktLTVZMLUFpRFV6RGd0d2F3?oc=5" target="_blank">CSU survey: Most students, faculty regularly use AI tools</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Action News Now</font>
🌪️ Proof of Work: The To-Do List of Infinite Regret
<p>**</p> <h2> What I Built </h2> <p>**<br> I built a productivity app for people who hate being productive. Proof of Work is a digital psychological experiment that turns simple task management into a high-stakes gamble.</p> <p>The gimmick? You cannot "check off" a task. To complete anything (e.g., "Buy Milk"), you must first win a game of Minesweeper on an Expert-level grid (30x16 with 99 mines). If you hit a mine, the Hydra Engine triggers: your task isn't cleared—it duplicates 20 times. Now you have to buy milk 21 times. It is a functional implementation of a "short-circuit" for the human brain.</p> <p>Demo<br> </p> <div class="crayons-card c-embed text-styles text-styles--secondary"> <div class="c-embed__content"> <div class="c-embed__body flex items-center justify-between"> <a href="
I Asked AI to Do Agile Sprint Planning (GitHub Copilot Test)
<p>AI tools are getting very good at writing code.</p> <p>GitHub Copilot can generate entire functions, review pull requests, and even help refactor legacy codebases. But software development isn’t just about writing code.</p> <p>A big part of the process is <strong>planning the work</strong>.</p> <p>So I decided to run a small experiment:</p> <p><strong>Can AI actually perform Agile sprint planning?</strong></p> <p>Using <strong>GitHub Copilot inside Visual Studio 2026</strong>, I asked AI to review a legacy codebase and generate a <strong>Scrum sprint plan for rewriting the application</strong>.</p> <p>The results were… interesting.</p> <h1> Watch Video </h1> <h2> <iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ErwuATHHXw4"> </iframe> </h2> <h1> The Setup </h1> <p>The experiment was intention
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!