Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessAutomate Your Handyman Pricing: The True Hourly Cost AI ForgetsDev.to AIToken Usage Is the New RAM UsageDev.to AIStop Writing Rules for AI AgentsDev.to AIBig Tech firms are accelerating AI investments and integration, while regulators and companies focus on safety and responsible adoption.Dev.to AIWhat’s the point of an AI novel?Financial Times TechLarge Language Models for Education: A Survey and OutlookDev.to AIHow to Publish a Paid API for AI Agents Using MCP and AgenticTradeDev.to AILatent Reasoning Sprint #3: Activation Difference Steering and Logit LensLessWrongDocker Model Runner vs Ollama: Local AI Deployment Compared 2026Dev.to AII Built an AI Content Pipeline That Publishes 4 SEO-Optimized Articles Per Day — Here's the ArchitectureDEV CommunityMy Reading Journey: Jan-Mar 2026DEV CommunityBuilding a Second Brain for Claude CodeDEV CommunityBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessAutomate Your Handyman Pricing: The True Hourly Cost AI ForgetsDev.to AIToken Usage Is the New RAM UsageDev.to AIStop Writing Rules for AI AgentsDev.to AIBig Tech firms are accelerating AI investments and integration, while regulators and companies focus on safety and responsible adoption.Dev.to AIWhat’s the point of an AI novel?Financial Times TechLarge Language Models for Education: A Survey and OutlookDev.to AIHow to Publish a Paid API for AI Agents Using MCP and AgenticTradeDev.to AILatent Reasoning Sprint #3: Activation Difference Steering and Logit LensLessWrongDocker Model Runner vs Ollama: Local AI Deployment Compared 2026Dev.to AII Built an AI Content Pipeline That Publishes 4 SEO-Optimized Articles Per Day — Here's the ArchitectureDEV CommunityMy Reading Journey: Jan-Mar 2026DEV CommunityBuilding a Second Brain for Claude CodeDEV Community
AI NEWS HUBbyEIGENVECTOREigenvector

The Computational Complexity of Avoiding Strict Saddle Points in Constrained Optimization

arXiv cs.DSby [Submitted on 2 Apr 2026]April 3, 20262 min read1 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2604.02285v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While first-order stationary points (FOSPs) are the traditional targets of non-convex optimization, they often correspond to undesirable strict saddle points. To circumvent this, attention has shifted towards second-order stationary points (SOSPs). In unconstrained settings, finding approximate SOSPs is PLS-complete (Kontogiannis et al.), matching the complexity of finding unconstrained FOSPs (Hollender and Zampetakis). However, the complexity of finding SOSPs in constrained settings remained notoriously unclear and was highlighted as an important open question by both aforementioned works. Under one strict definition, even verifying whether a point is an approximate SOSP is NP-hard (Murty and Kabadi). Under another widely adopted, relaxed

View PDF

Abstract:While first-order stationary points (FOSPs) are the traditional targets of non-convex optimization, they often correspond to undesirable strict saddle points. To circumvent this, attention has shifted towards second-order stationary points (SOSPs). In unconstrained settings, finding approximate SOSPs is PLS-complete (Kontogiannis et al.), matching the complexity of finding unconstrained FOSPs (Hollender and Zampetakis). However, the complexity of finding SOSPs in constrained settings remained notoriously unclear and was highlighted as an important open question by both aforementioned works. Under one strict definition, even verifying whether a point is an approximate SOSP is NP-hard (Murty and Kabadi). Under another widely adopted, relaxed definition where non-negative curvature is required only along the null space of the active constraints, the problem lies in TFNP, and algorithms with O(poly(1/epsilon)) running times have been proposed (Lu et al.). In this work, we settle the complexity of constrained SOSP by proving that computing an epsilon-approximate SOSP under the tractable definition is PLS-complete. We demonstrate that our result holds even in the 2D unit square [0,1]^2, and remarkably, even when stationary points are isolated at a distance of Omega(1) from the domain's boundary. Our result establishes a fundamental barrier: unless PLS is a subset of PPAD (implying PLS = CLS), no deterministic, iterative algorithm with an efficient, continuous update rule can exist for finding approximate SOSPs. This contrasts with the constrained first-order counterpart, for which Fearnley et al. showed that finding an approximate KKT point is CLS-complete. Finally, our result yields the first problem defined in a compact domain to be shown PLS-complete beyond the canonical Real-LocalOpt (Daskalakis and Papadimitriou)."

Comments: Abstract shortened to meet arXiv requirements

Subjects:

Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)

Cite as: arXiv:2604.02285 [cs.CC]

(or arXiv:2604.02285v1 [cs.CC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.02285

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ioannis Panageas [view email] [v1] Thu, 2 Apr 2026 17:26:44 UTC (7,582 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by Eigenvector · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

announceupdatearxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
The Computa…announceupdatearxivarXiv cs.DS

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 181 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Releases