Stop Writing Rules for AI Agents
Stop Writing Rules for AI Agents Every developer building AI agents makes the same mistake: they write rules. "Don't do X." "Always do Y." Rules feel like control. But they are an illusion. Why Rules Fail Rules are static. Agents operate in dynamic environments. The moment reality diverges from your rule set it breaks. Behavior Over Rules Instead of telling your agent what NOT to do, design what it IS: The system prompt (identity, not restrictions) The tools available (capability shapes behavior) The feedback loops (what gets rewarded) The memory architecture A Real Example I built FORGE, an autonomous AI agent running 24/7. Early versions had dozens of rules. Every rule created a new edge case. The fix: stop writing rules, start designing behavior. FORGE's identity: orchestrator, not exec
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Dev.to AI →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
availableversionrestrict
Anthropic Races to Contain Leak of Code Behind Claude AI Agent - WSJ
Anthropic Races to Contain Leak of Code Behind Claude AI Agent WSJ Anthropic leak reveals Claude Code tracking user frustration and raises new questions about AI privacy Scientific American Anthropic leaked 500,000 lines of its own source code Axios
Anthropic Races to Contain Leak of Code Behind Claude AI Agent - WSJ
Anthropic Races to Contain Leak of Code Behind Claude AI Agent WSJ Anthropic leak reveals Claude Code tracking user frustration and raises new questions about AI privacy Scientific American Anthropic leaked 500,000 lines of its own source code Axios
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Releases
5 Signs You're Ready to Build Your SaaS (And 3 Signs You're Not)
5 Signs You're Ready to Build Your SaaS (And 3 Signs You're Not) Spending $10,000 building the wrong thing is worse than spending nothing. Before you hire anyone or write a line of code, read this. Every week I talk to founders who want to build a SaaS. Some of them are genuinely ready. Some of them will waste a lot of money if they start today. After 7+ years of building and shipping products, I've developed a pretty good sense for which is which. Here are the signals I look for. ✅ 5 Signs You're Ready 1. You've talked to at least 10 potential users — and they were specific about their pain Not "do you think this is a good idea?" conversations. Real conversations where you asked: What's your current process? What's broken about it? How much time does it waste? What have you tried to fix i
PRCCF: A Persona-guided Retrieval and Causal-aware Cognitive Filtering Framework for Emotional Support Conversation
arXiv:2604.01671v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Emotional Support Conversation (ESC) aims to alleviate individual emotional distress by generating empathetic responses. However, existing methods face challenges in effectively supporting deep contextual understanding. To address this issue, we propose PRCCF, a Persona-guided Retrieval and Causality-aware Cognitive Filtering framework. Specifically, the framework incorporates a persona-guided retrieval mechanism that jointly models semantic compatibility and persona alignment to enhance response generation. Furthermore, it employs a causality-aware cognitive filtering module to prioritize causally relevant external knowledge, thereby improving contextual cognitive understanding for emotional reasoning. Extensive experiments on the ESConv dat
A Dynamic Atlas of Persian Poetic Symbolism: Families, Fields, and the Historical Rewiring of Meaning
arXiv:2604.01467v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persian poetry is often remembered through recurrent symbols before it is remembered through plot. Wine vessels, gardens, flames, sacred titles, bodily beauty, and courtly names return across centuries, yet computational work still tends to flatten this material into isolated words or broad document semantics. That misses a practical unit of organization in Persian poetics: related forms travel as families and gain force through recurring relations. Using a corpus of 129,451 poems, we consolidate recurrent forms into traceable families, separate imagistic material from sacred and courtly reference, and map their relations in a multi-layer graph. The symbolic core is relatively sparse, the referential component much denser, and the attachment
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!