IBM And ETH Zurich Launch 10-Year Algorithmic Research Initiative - Quantum Zeitgeist
IBM And ETH Zurich Launch 10-Year Algorithmic Research Initiative Quantum Zeitgeist
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on GNews AI quantum →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
launchresearchKnowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Releases

![[D] Reviewer said he will increase his score but he hasn’t (yet)](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-neural-network-P6fqXULWLNUwjuxqUZnB3T.webp)
[D] Reviewer said he will increase his score but he hasn’t (yet)
Maybe someone here can help me figure this out. I have a reviewer who acknowledged my rebuttal and said they will increase their score*, but they haven’t. Their score is still 4, which was the initial score. Now I am very anxious about the AC reading this and thinking that they increased their score to 4 from a 3 ( meaning their initial thought was reject) because the other person who acknowledged and said they will increase their score did it on the spot at the same time, and I can see the updated score, but the other said they will but didn’t, and now I fear it will look like they did and that the 4 is the updated score ( meaning the initial score was a reject). I can answer to the rebuttal ( they said option A, fully resolved). I wonder if in my answer I should hint that they have yet t




Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!