User-preference alignment with uncertainty-aware interactive rectification for liver organ and tumor segmentation and analysis from CT images

References

• Wild, C. P., Weiderpass, E. & Stewart, B. W. World cancer report (IARC, 2020).
• Sedano, R. et al. Immunotherapy for cancer: common gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic side effects and their management. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 117, 1917–1932 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Midya, A. et al. Computerized diagnosis of liver tumors from ct scans using a deep neural network approach. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 27, 2456–2464 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Shiina, S. et al. Percutaneous ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of various ablation techniques and surgery. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 4756147 (2018).

Google Scholar

• Gul, S. et al. Deep learning techniques for liver and liver tumor segmentation: a review. Comput. Biol. Med. 147, 105620 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Bilic, P. et al. The liver tumor segmentation benchmark (lits). Med. Image Anal. 84, 102680 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Ma, J. et al. Abdomenct-1k: Is abdominal organ segmentation a solved problem? IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 6695–6714 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Eisenhauer, E. A. et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised recist guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer 45, 228–247 (2009).

Google Scholar

• Virdis, F. et al. Clinical outcomes of primary arterial embolization in severe hepatic trauma: a systematic review. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 100, 65–75 (2019).

Google Scholar

• Todorov, M. I. et al. Machine learning analysis of whole mouse brain vasculature. Nat. Methods 17, 442–449 (2020).

Google Scholar

• Azad, R. et al. Medical image segmentation review: the success of U-Net. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 46, 10076–10095 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Alirr, O. I. & Rahni, A. A. A. Survey on liver tumour resection planning system: steps, techniques, and parameters. J. Digit. Imaging 33, 304–323 (2020).

Google Scholar

• Moghbel, M., Mashohor, S., Mahmud, R. & Saripan, M. I. B. Review of liver segmentation and computer assisted detection/diagnosis methods in computed tomography. Artif. Intell. Rev. 50, 497–537 (2018).

Google Scholar

• Hesamian, M. H., Jia, W., He, X. & Kennedy, P. Deep learning techniques for medical image segmentation: achievements and challenges. J. Digit. Imaging 32, 582–596 (2019).

Google Scholar

• Baumgartner, C. F. et al. Phiseg: Capturing uncertainty in medical image segmentation. In Proc. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 119–127 (Springer, 2019).
• Prasanna, P. G. et al. Normal tissue protection for improving radiotherapy: where are the gaps? Transl. Cancer Res. 1, 35 (2012).

Google Scholar

• Zhu, J., Wu, J., Ouyang, C., Kamnitsas, K. & Noble, J. A. Spa: efficient user-preference alignment against uncertainty in medical image segmentation. In Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 23731–23740 (IEEE, 2025).
• Zhang, Y., Shen, Z. & Jiao, R. Segment anything model for medical image segmentation: current applications and future directions. Comput. Biol. Med. 171, 108238 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Kirillov, A. et al. Segment anything. In Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 4015–4026 (IEEE, 2023).
• Ma, J. et al. Segment anything in medical images. Nat. Commun. 15, 654 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Wang, H. et al. Sam-med3d: towards general-purpose segmentation models for volumetric medical images. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision, 51–67 (Springer, 2024).
• Zhang, Y. et al. Enhancing the reliability of auto-prompting sam for medical image segmentation with uncertainty estimation and rectification. In Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 1282–1291 (IEEE, 2025).
• Deng, G. et al. Sam-u: Multi-box prompts triggered uncertainty estimation for reliable sam in medical image. In Proc. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 368–377 (Springer, 2023).
• Li, W. et al. Abdomenatlas: a large-scale, detailed-annotated & multi-center dataset for efficient transfer learning and open algorithmic benchmarking. Med. Image Anal. 97, 103285 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Proc. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, 234–241 (Springer, 2015).
• Chen, J. et al. Transunet: rethinking the U-Net architecture design for medical image segmentation through the lens of transformers. Med. Image Anal. 97, 103280 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Lei, W., Xu, W., Li, K., Zhang, X. & Zhang, S. Medlsam: Localize and segment anything model for 3d ct images. Med. Image Anal. 99, 103370 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Zhang, D., Chen, B., Chong, J. & Li, S. Weakly-supervised teacher-student network for liver tumor segmentation from non-enhanced images. Med. Image Anal. 70, 102005 (2021).

Google Scholar

• Ma, Y., Wang, J., Yang, J. & Wang, L. Model-heterogeneous semi-supervised federated learning for medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 43, 1804–1815 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Jiang, M., Yang, H., Cheng, C. & Dou, Q. Iop-fl: Inside-outside personalization for federated medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 42, 2106–2117 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Zhao, J. et al. United adversarial learning for liver tumor segmentation and detection of multi-modality non-contrast mri. Med. Image Anal. 73, 102154 (2021).

Google Scholar

• Ji, Y. et al. Amos: A large-scale abdominal multi-organ benchmark for versatile medical image segmentation. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 36722–36732 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Zhang, Y. et al. Seganypet: Universal promptable segmentation from positron emission tomography images. In Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 21107–21116 (IEEE, 2025).
• Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Agarwal, D. & Sun, J. Medclip: contrastive learning from unpaired medical images and text. Proc. Conf. Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process. 2022, 3876 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Moor, M. et al. Med-flamingo: a multimodal medical few-shot learner. In Machine Learning for Health (ML4H), 353–367 (PMLR, 2023).
• Zhang, Y. et al. Semisam+: rethinking semi-supervised medical image segmentation in the era of foundation models. Med. Image Anal. (2025).
• Ali, M. et al. A review of the segment anything model (sam) for medical image analysis: accomplishments and perspectives. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 119, 102473 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Jiao, R. et al. Learning with limited annotations: a survey on deep semi-supervised learning for medical image segmentation. Comput. Biol. Med. 169, 107840 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Zhang, Y., Jiao, R., Liao, Q., Li, D. & Zhang, J. Uncertainty-guided mutual consistency learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. Artif. Intell. Med. 138, 102476 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Zou, K. et al. A review of uncertainty estimation and its application in medical imaging. Meta Radiol. 1, 100003 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Zhou, N. et al. Medsam-u: Uncertainty-guided auto multi-prompt adaptation for reliable medsam. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 36, 3768–3781 (2025).

Google Scholar

Download references