pandas vs Polars vs DuckDB: A Data Scientist’s Guide to Choosing the Right Tool
Image by author Originally published on codecut.ai Introduction pandas has been the standard tool for working with tabular data in Python for over a decade. But as datasets grow larger and performance requirements increase, two modern alternatives have emerged: Polars , a DataFrame library written in Rust, and DuckDB , an embedded SQL database optimized for analytics. Each tool excels in different scenarios: ┌────────┬──────────┬────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Tool │ Backend │ Execution Model │ Best For │ ├────────┼──────────┼────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ pandas │ C/Python │ Eager, single-threaded │ Small datasets, prototyping, ML integration │ │ Polars │ Rust │ Lazy/Eager, multi-threaded
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Towards AI →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
modelbenchmarkavailable
Adaptive Fully Dynamic $k$-Center Clustering with (Near-)Optimal Worst-Case Guarantees
arXiv:2604.01726v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Given a sequence of adversarial point insertions and point deletions, is it possible to simultaneously optimize the approximation ratio, update time, and recourse for a $k$-clustering problem? If so, can this be achieved with worst-case guarantees against an adaptive adversary? These questions have garnered significant attention in recent years. Prior works by Bhattacharya, Costa, Garg, Lattanzi, and Parotsidis [FOCS '24] and by Bhattacharya, Costa, and Farokhnejad [STOC '25] have taken significant steps toward this direction for the $k$-median clustering problem and its generalization, the $(k, z)$-clustering problem. In this paper, we study the $k$-center clustering problem, which is one of the most classical and well-studied $k$-clustering
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products
Towards Robustness: A Critique of Current Vector Database Assessments
arXiv:2507.00379v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vector databases are critical infrastructure in AI systems, and average recall is the dominant metric for their evaluation. Both users and researchers rely on it to choose and optimize their systems. We show that relying on average recall is problematic. It hides variability across queries, allowing systems with strong mean performance to underperform significantly on hard queries. These tail cases confuse users and can lead to failure in downstream applications such as RAG. We argue that robustness consistently achieving acceptable recall across queries is crucial to vector database evaluation. We propose Robustness-$\delta$@K, a new metric that captures the fraction of queries with recall above a threshold $\delta$. This metric offers a
GPU-RMQ: Accelerating Range Minimum Queries on Modern GPUs
arXiv:2604.01811v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Range minimum queries are frequently used in string processing and database applications including biological sequence analysis, document retrieval, and web search. Hence, various data structures have been proposed for improving their efficiency on both CPUs and GPUs.Recent work has also shown that hardware-accelerated ray tracing on modern NVIDIA RTX graphic cards can be exploited to answer range minimum queries by expressing queries as rays, which are fired into a scene of triangles representing minima of ranges at different granularities. While these approaches are promising, they suffer from at least one of three issues: severe memory overhead, high index construction time, and low query throughput. This renders these methods practically
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!