Identifying Privacy Concerns in Upcoming Software Release: A Peek into the Future
Hey there, little explorer! 🚀
Imagine you have a super cool new toy car you made! Before you show it to all your friends, you want to make sure it's super safe and fun, right?
This news is about computer games and apps, like the ones on mommy's phone! 📱
Sometimes, these apps ask for things like your name or where you live. That's like asking for your secret treasure map! 🗺️ We want to keep your treasure map safe.
Grown-ups who make apps used to wait until after you played with the app to see if you thought it was safe. But now, clever computer brains have found a way to guess if the app might ask for too much info before you even play with it!
It's like having a magic crystal ball that tells you if your toy car might lose a wheel before you even drive it! 🔮 So, the grown-ups can fix it and make sure your secret treasure map is always safe. Yay! 🎉
arXiv:2604.01393v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Identifying the features to be released in the next version of software, from a pool of potential candidates, is a challenging problem. User feedback from app stores is frequently used by software vendors for the evolution of apps across releases. Privacy feedback, although smaller in volume, carries a larger impact influencing app's success. Multiple existing work has focused on summarizing privacy concerns at the app level and has also shown that developers utilize feedback to implement security and privacy-related changes in subsequent releases. However, the current literature offers little support for release managers and developers in identifying privacy concerns prior to release. This gap exists as user reviews are typically available i
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Identifying the features to be released in the next version of software, from a pool of potential candidates, is a challenging problem. User feedback from app stores is frequently used by software vendors for the evolution of apps across releases. Privacy feedback, although smaller in volume, carries a larger impact influencing app's success. Multiple existing work has focused on summarizing privacy concerns at the app level and has also shown that developers utilize feedback to implement security and privacy-related changes in subsequent releases. However, the current literature offers little support for release managers and developers in identifying privacy concerns prior to release. This gap exists as user reviews are typically available in app stores only after new features of a software system is released. In this paper, we introduce Pre-PI, a novel approach that summarizes privacy concerns for to-be-released features. Our method first maps existing features to semantically similar privacy reviews to learn feature-privacy review relations. We then simulate feedback for candidate features and generate concise summaries of privacy concerns. We evaluate Pre-PI across three real-world apps, and compare it with Hark, a state-of-the-art method that relies on post-release user feedback to identify privacy concerns. Results show that Pre-PI generates additional valid privacy concerns and identifies these concerns earlier than Hark, allowing proactive mitigation prior to release.
Comments: Revising manuscript for IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Subjects:
Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.01393 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2604.01393v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01393
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Aurek Chattopadhyay [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 20:51:14 UTC (485 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
releaseannounceavailable
5 Signs You're Ready to Build Your SaaS (And 3 Signs You're Not)
5 Signs You're Ready to Build Your SaaS (And 3 Signs You're Not) Spending $10,000 building the wrong thing is worse than spending nothing. Before you hire anyone or write a line of code, read this. Every week I talk to founders who want to build a SaaS. Some of them are genuinely ready. Some of them will waste a lot of money if they start today. After 7+ years of building and shipping products, I've developed a pretty good sense for which is which. Here are the signals I look for. ✅ 5 Signs You're Ready 1. You've talked to at least 10 potential users — and they were specific about their pain Not "do you think this is a good idea?" conversations. Real conversations where you asked: What's your current process? What's broken about it? How much time does it waste? What have you tried to fix i
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Releases

5 Signs You're Ready to Build Your SaaS (And 3 Signs You're Not)
5 Signs You're Ready to Build Your SaaS (And 3 Signs You're Not) Spending $10,000 building the wrong thing is worse than spending nothing. Before you hire anyone or write a line of code, read this. Every week I talk to founders who want to build a SaaS. Some of them are genuinely ready. Some of them will waste a lot of money if they start today. After 7+ years of building and shipping products, I've developed a pretty good sense for which is which. Here are the signals I look for. ✅ 5 Signs You're Ready 1. You've talked to at least 10 potential users — and they were specific about their pain Not "do you think this is a good idea?" conversations. Real conversations where you asked: What's your current process? What's broken about it? How much time does it waste? What have you tried to fix i

PRCCF: A Persona-guided Retrieval and Causal-aware Cognitive Filtering Framework for Emotional Support Conversation
arXiv:2604.01671v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Emotional Support Conversation (ESC) aims to alleviate individual emotional distress by generating empathetic responses. However, existing methods face challenges in effectively supporting deep contextual understanding. To address this issue, we propose PRCCF, a Persona-guided Retrieval and Causality-aware Cognitive Filtering framework. Specifically, the framework incorporates a persona-guided retrieval mechanism that jointly models semantic compatibility and persona alignment to enhance response generation. Furthermore, it employs a causality-aware cognitive filtering module to prioritize causally relevant external knowledge, thereby improving contextual cognitive understanding for emotional reasoning. Extensive experiments on the ESConv dat

A Dynamic Atlas of Persian Poetic Symbolism: Families, Fields, and the Historical Rewiring of Meaning
arXiv:2604.01467v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persian poetry is often remembered through recurrent symbols before it is remembered through plot. Wine vessels, gardens, flames, sacred titles, bodily beauty, and courtly names return across centuries, yet computational work still tends to flatten this material into isolated words or broad document semantics. That misses a practical unit of organization in Persian poetics: related forms travel as families and gain force through recurring relations. Using a corpus of 129,451 poems, we consolidate recurrent forms into traceable families, separate imagistic material from sacred and courtly reference, and map their relations in a multi-layer graph. The symbolic core is relatively sparse, the referential component much denser, and the attachment




Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!