An Online Machine Learning Multi-resolution Optimization Framework for Energy System Design Limit of Performance Analysis
arXiv:2604.01308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Designing reliable integrated energy systems for industrial processes requires optimization and verification models across multiple fidelities, from architecture-level sizing to high-fidelity dynamic operation. However, model mismatch across fidelities obscures the sources of performance loss and complicates the quantification of architecture-to-operation performance gaps. We propose an online, machine-learning-accelerated multi-resolution optimization framework that estimates an architecture-specific upper bound on achievable performance while m — Oluwamayowa O. Amusat, Luka Grbcic, Remi Patureau, M. Jibran S. Zuberi, Dan Gunter, Michael Wetter
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Designing reliable integrated energy systems for industrial processes requires optimization and verification models across multiple fidelities, from architecture-level sizing to high-fidelity dynamic operation. However, model mismatch across fidelities obscures the sources of performance loss and complicates the quantification of architecture-to-operation performance gaps. We propose an online, machine-learning-accelerated multi-resolution optimization framework that estimates an architecture-specific upper bound on achievable performance while minimizing expensive high-fidelity model evaluations. We demonstrate the approach on a pilot energy system supplying a 1 MW industrial heat load. First, we solve a multi-objective architecture optimization to select the system configuration and component capacities. We then develop an machine learning (ML)-accelerated multi-resolution, receding-horizon optimal control strategy that approaches the achievable-performance bound for the specified architecture, given the additional controls and dynamics not captured by the architectural optimization model. The ML-guided controller adaptively schedules the optimization resolution based on predictive uncertainty and warm-starts high-fidelity solves using elite low-fidelity solutions. Our results on the pilot case study show that the proposed multi-resolution strategy reduces the architecture-to-operation performance gap by up to 42% relative to a rule-based controller, while reducing required high-fidelity model evaluations by 34% relative to the same multi-fidelity approach without ML guidance, enabling faster and more reliable design verification. Together, these gains make high-fidelity verification tractable, providing a practical upper bound on achievable operational performance.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.01308 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2604.01308v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01308
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Luka Grbcic [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 18:19:45 UTC (312 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
How to Build an AI Content Playbook That Actually Protects Your Voice
Ahnii! You've read the articles warning you not to let AI take over your content. Ruth Doherty's latest piece is one of the best: a clear-eyed breakdown of where AI helps and where it silently destroys your brand. This post shows you how to take that framework and turn it into an actual operating document for your content pipeline. Why a Framework Without a Playbook Doesn't Stick Ruth's core argument is sharp: AI is an efficiency engine, not a strategy engine. Use it for research, structuring, repurposing, and editing. Keep it away from messaging, customer research, and anything that requires your actual point of view. That distinction is easy to agree with. It's harder to enforce on a Tuesday afternoon when you're behind on three social posts and the AI can draft all of them in 90 seconds

Top 10 Best Universities to Study AI in USA 2026 Led by CMU and MIT With Strong Research and Industry Ties - International Business Times Australia
Top 10 Best Universities to Study AI in USA 2026 Led by CMU and MIT With Strong Research and Industry Ties International Business Times Australia
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.




Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!