Symmetrizing Bregman Divergence on the Cone of Positive Definite Matrices: Which Mean to Use and Why
This work uncovers variational principles behind symmetrizing the Bregman divergences induced by generic mirror maps over the cone of positive definite matrices. We show that computing the canonical means for this symmetrization can be posed as minimizing the desired symmetrized divergences over a set of mean functionals defined axiomatically to satisfy certain properties. For the forward symmetrization, we prove that the arithmetic mean over the primal space is canonical for any mirror map over the positive definite cone. For the reverse symmetrization, we show that the canonical mean is the — Tushar Sial, Abhishek Halder
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:This work uncovers variational principles behind symmetrizing the Bregman divergences induced by generic mirror maps over the cone of positive definite matrices. We show that computing the canonical means for this symmetrization can be posed as minimizing the desired symmetrized divergences over a set of mean functionals defined axiomatically to satisfy certain properties. For the forward symmetrization, we prove that the arithmetic mean over the primal space is canonical for any mirror map over the positive definite cone. For the reverse symmetrization, we show that the canonical mean is the arithmetic mean over the dual space, pulled back to the primal space. Applying this result to three common mirror maps used in practice, we show that the canonical means for reverse symmetrization, in those cases, turn out to be the arithmetic, log-Euclidean and harmonic means. Our results improve understanding of existing symmetrization practices in the literature, and can be seen as a navigational chart to help decide which mean to use when.
Subjects:
Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28917 [math.OC]
(or arXiv:2603.28917v1 [math.OC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28917
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Abhishek Halder [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 18:48:50 UTC (77 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Study finds smart glasses boost AI scribe accuracy and more briefs
Flinders study tests vision-enabled AI scribe Researchers at Flinders University have tested a vision-enabled AI clinical scribe combining Google Gemini and Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses and found improved accuracy in documenting pharmacist-patient consultations.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Study finds smart glasses boost AI scribe accuracy and more briefs
Flinders study tests vision-enabled AI scribe Researchers at Flinders University have tested a vision-enabled AI clinical scribe combining Google Gemini and Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses and found improved accuracy in documenting pharmacist-patient consultations.
[R] ICML Anonymized git repos for rebuttal
A number of the papers I'm reviewing for have submitted additional figures and code through anonymized git repos (e.g. https://anonymous.4open.science/ ) to help supplement their rebuttal. Is this against any policy? I'm considering submitting additional graphs during the discussion phase for clarity, and would like to make sure that won't cause any issues submitted by /u/drahcirenoob [link] [comments]
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!