Evaluating Human-AI Safety: A Framework for Measuring Harmful Capability Uplift

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Current frontier AI safety evaluations emphasize static benchmarks, third-party annotations, and red-teaming. In this position paper, we argue that AI safety research should focus on human-centered evaluations that measure harmful capability uplift: the marginal increase in a user's ability to cause harm with a frontier model beyond what conventional tools already enable. We frame harmful capability uplift as a core AI safety metric, ground it in prior social science research, and provide concrete methodological guidance for systematic measurement. We conclude with actionable steps for developers, researchers, funders, and regulators to make harmful capability uplift evaluation a standard practice.

Subjects:

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.26676 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2603.26676v1 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26676

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Michelle Vaccaro [view email] [v1] Fri, 6 Mar 2026 20:29:20 UTC (4,918 KB)