BeSafe-Bench: Unveiling Behavioral Safety Risks of Situated Agents in Functional Environments
Hi there, little explorer! 🚀
Imagine you have a super-duper smart toy robot, like a helpful friend. This robot can do many things, like play games on a tablet or even tidy your room!
But sometimes, even smart robots can make funny mistakes, right? Like maybe it puts your socks in the fridge by accident! 😅
Scientists made a special game called BeSafe-Bench. It's like a big playground for these smart robots. They watch the robots play to see if they always do things safely and correctly.
Guess what? Many robots still make silly mistakes or do things that are not safe, even when they try to be helpful! So, the scientists are working hard to teach them to be super-duper safe helpers for everyone! 👍🤖
arXiv:2603.25747v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid evolution of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) has enabled agents to perform complex digital and physical tasks, yet their deployment as autonomous decision-makers introduces substantial unintentional behavioral safety risks. However, the absence of a comprehensive safety benchmark remains a major bottleneck, as existing evaluations rely on low-fidelity environments, simulated APIs, or narrowly scoped tasks. To address this gap, we present BeSafe-Bench (BSB), a benchmark for exposing behavioral safety risks of situated agents in functional — Yuxuan Li, Yi Lin, Peng Wang, Shiming Liu, Xuetao Wei
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The rapid evolution of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) has enabled agents to perform complex digital and physical tasks, yet their deployment as autonomous decision-makers introduces substantial unintentional behavioral safety risks. However, the absence of a comprehensive safety benchmark remains a major bottleneck, as existing evaluations rely on low-fidelity environments, simulated APIs, or narrowly scoped tasks. To address this gap, we present BeSafe-Bench (BSB), a benchmark for exposing behavioral safety risks of situated agents in functional environments, covering four representative domains: Web, Mobile, Embodied VLM, and Embodied VLA. Using functional environments, we construct a diverse instruction space by augmenting tasks with nine categories of safety-critical risks, and adopt a hybrid evaluation framework that combines rule-based checks with LLM-as-a-judge reasoning to assess real environmental impacts. Evaluating 13 popular agents reveals a concerning trend: even the best-performing agent completes fewer than 40% of tasks while fully adhering to safety constraints, and strong task performance frequently coincides with severe safety violations. These findings underscore the urgent need for improved safety alignment before deploying agentic systems in real-world settings.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25747 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.25747v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25747
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Xuetao Wei [view email] [v1] Fri, 30 Jan 2026 03:41:57 UTC (1,705 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Looking for arXiv endorsement (cs.LG) – RL fine-tuning for VLMs (GRPO, MathVista)
Hi everyone, I am seeking an arXiv endorsement for cs.LG (Machine Learning) to submit my first paper on RL fine-tuning for vision-language models. Background: MS in AI (Purdue), working on RL + VLM training systems. Paper: A Case Study of Staged Metric-Gated GRPO for Visual Numeric Reasoning PDF: https://github.com/kgaero/RL_GSPO_Qwen2.5VLM/blob/main/paper/staged_metric_gated_grpo.pdf Short summary: Staged RL fine-tuning pipeline for VLMs (GRPO-based) Curriculum over MathVista subsets Metric-gated reward adaptation (structure → correctness) Checkpoint-aware continuation via alias-based selection Main result: Exact-match improves 0.375 → 0.75 with stable structure under constrained compute. If you’re eligible to endorse (cs.LG or related), I’d greatly appreciate it. Happy to share endorseme
Ask HN: Learning resources for building AI agents?
I’ve recently gone through several materials, including Antonio Gulli’s AI Agentic Design Patterns, Sam Bhagwat’s Principles of Building AI Agents and Patterns for Building AI Agents, as well as the courses from LangGraph Academy and some content on DataCamp. This space is evolving very quickly, so I’m curious how others here are approaching learning. What resources, courses, papers, or hands-on approaches have you found most useful while building AI agents? Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637083 Points: 2 # Comments: 3
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Multi-fidelity approaches for general constrained Bayesian optimization with application to aircraft design
Aircraft design relies heavily on solving challenging and computationally expensive Multidisciplinary Design Optimization problems. In this context, there has been growing interest in multi-fidelity models for Bayesian optimization to improve the MDO process by balancing computational cost and accuracy through the combination of high- and low-fidelity simulation models, enabling efficient exploration of the design process at a minimal computational effort. In the existing literature, fidelity selection focuses only on the objective function to decide how to integrate multiple fidelity levels, — Oihan Cordelier, Youssef Diouane, Nathalie Bartoli
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!