AI tools are great for individuals. but what about your team?
<p>Everyone on your team is using AI. Cursor, Copilot, Claude, ChatGPT. Individually, they work really well.</p> <p>But here's the thing. Every AI session is a solo conversation. Your teammate asked Claude about the error handling. You asked GPT to scaffold the API. PM used ChatGPT for the requirements. Three separate contexts. Nobody sees each other's work.</p> <p>PR review comes. It doesn't match what was discussed. "Wait, when did we decide that?" Rework starts.</p> <p>The problem isn't AI itself. It's that there's no team layer on top of it.</p> <h2> Why I started building this </h2> <p>I'm a product designer, been working in enterprise for over 10 years at places like Morningstar and JLL. I saw this pattern way before AI tools existed. Decisions live in Slack threads, Notion docs, som
Everyone on your team is using AI. Cursor, Copilot, Claude, ChatGPT. Individually, they work really well.
But here's the thing. Every AI session is a solo conversation. Your teammate asked Claude about the error handling. You asked GPT to scaffold the API. PM used ChatGPT for the requirements. Three separate contexts. Nobody sees each other's work.
PR review comes. It doesn't match what was discussed. "Wait, when did we decide that?" Rework starts.
The problem isn't AI itself. It's that there's no team layer on top of it.
Why I started building this
I'm a product designer, been working in enterprise for over 10 years at places like Morningstar and JLL. I saw this pattern way before AI tools existed. Decisions live in Slack threads, Notion docs, someone's head. AI just made the gap worse because now everyone moves faster, but in different directions.
I wanted to fix what happens between "we agreed on this" and "the code actually ships."
What Scindo does
It's a workspace where your team discusses, plans, and ships with AI agents in the same thread.
-
Chat → Agent and team discuss together. Edge cases come up in the conversation, not in PR comments later.
-
Plan → Agent drafts a plan from what was discussed. Team reviews it.
-
Build → Developer opens their editor with the plan loaded.
-
Ship → Agent opens the PR. Reviewer sees the plan and the code diff together.
There are different agent roles, Engineer, QA, Security, Designer, Product. Connects to GitHub, Jira, Notion, Linear, Figma. Works in VS Code and CLI too.
Pricing is per-workspace, not per-seat. Because the whole point is getting the whole team in.
Where we are
Three weeks since launch. Small group of early users. Free tier is 50 AI responses/month, 1 workspace, up to 3 members. Enough to try it on a real feature.
Curious how other small teams handle this. How do you go from "we agreed on this" to "the code matches what we agreed on"?
scindo.one
DEV Community
https://dev.to/oneslash/ai-tools-are-great-for-individuals-but-what-about-your-team-li9Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
claudelaunchproduct
My most common advice for junior researchers
Written quickly as part of the Inkhaven Fellowship . At a high level, research feedback I give to more junior research collaborators often can fall into one of three categories: Doing quick sanity checks Saying precisely what you want to say Asking why one more time In each case, I think the advice can be taken to an extreme I no longer endorse. Accordingly, I’ve tried to spell out the degree to which you should implement the advice, as well as what “taking it too far” might look like. This piece covers doing quick sanity checks, which is the most common advice I give to junior researchers. I’ll cover the other two pieces of advice in a subsequent piece. Doing quick sanity checks Research is hard (almost by definition) and people are often wrong. Every researcher has wasted countless hours
Open Source Project of the Day (Part 27): Awesome AI Coding - A One-Stop AI Programming Resource Navigator
<h2> Introduction </h2> <blockquote> <p>"AI coding tools and resources are scattered everywhere. A topically organized, searchable, contributable list can save enormous amounts of search time."</p> </blockquote> <p>This is Part 27 of the "Open Source Project of the Day" series. Today we explore <strong>Awesome AI Coding</strong> (<a href="https://github.com/chendongqi/awesome-ai-coding" rel="noopener noreferrer">GitHub</a>).</p> <p>When doing AI-assisted programming, you'll face questions like: which editor or terminal tool should I use? For multi-agent frameworks, should I pick MetaGPT or CrewAI? What RAG frameworks and vector databases are available? Where do I find MCP servers? What ready-made templates are there for Claude Code Rules and Skills? <strong>Awesome AI Coding</strong> is ex
Building Real-Time Features in React Without WebSocket Libraries
<h1> Building Real-Time Features in React Without WebSocket Libraries </h1> <p>When developers hear "real-time," they reach for WebSocket libraries. Socket.IO, Pusher, Ably -- the ecosystem is full of them. But many real-time features do not need bidirectional communication. A stock ticker, a notification feed, a deployment log, a live sports score -- all of these are one-directional streams from server to client. For these use cases, the browser already has a built-in protocol that is simpler, lighter, and automatically reconnects: <strong>Server-Sent Events (SSE)</strong>.</p> <p>Combine SSE with the Network Information API for connection awareness, and the BroadcastChannel API for cross-tab coordination, and you have a complete real-time toolkit -- zero WebSocket libraries required. In
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products
Open Source Project of the Day (Part 27): Awesome AI Coding - A One-Stop AI Programming Resource Navigator
<h2> Introduction </h2> <blockquote> <p>"AI coding tools and resources are scattered everywhere. A topically organized, searchable, contributable list can save enormous amounts of search time."</p> </blockquote> <p>This is Part 27 of the "Open Source Project of the Day" series. Today we explore <strong>Awesome AI Coding</strong> (<a href="https://github.com/chendongqi/awesome-ai-coding" rel="noopener noreferrer">GitHub</a>).</p> <p>When doing AI-assisted programming, you'll face questions like: which editor or terminal tool should I use? For multi-agent frameworks, should I pick MetaGPT or CrewAI? What RAG frameworks and vector databases are available? Where do I find MCP servers? What ready-made templates are there for Claude Code Rules and Skills? <strong>Awesome AI Coding</strong> is ex
Building Real-Time Features in React Without WebSocket Libraries
<h1> Building Real-Time Features in React Without WebSocket Libraries </h1> <p>When developers hear "real-time," they reach for WebSocket libraries. Socket.IO, Pusher, Ably -- the ecosystem is full of them. But many real-time features do not need bidirectional communication. A stock ticker, a notification feed, a deployment log, a live sports score -- all of these are one-directional streams from server to client. For these use cases, the browser already has a built-in protocol that is simpler, lighter, and automatically reconnects: <strong>Server-Sent Events (SSE)</strong>.</p> <p>Combine SSE with the Network Information API for connection awareness, and the BroadcastChannel API for cross-tab coordination, and you have a complete real-time toolkit -- zero WebSocket libraries required. In
How to Auto-Index Your URLs with Google Search Console API
<p><a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fgbrezb3lxo2w93fcb370.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"><img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fgbrezb3lxo2w93fcb370.png" alt=" " width="800" height="260"></a></p> <p>Stop waiting weeks for Google to discover your pages. Learn how to use Google's Indexing API, URL Inspection API, and Search Console API to automate URL submission and track indexing status — with daily rate limits explained.</p> <p>If your website has hundreds or thousands of pages — product listings,
The Data Structure That's Okay With Being Wrong
<h2> The Million-Row Problem </h2> <p>You're building a URL shortener. Every time someone creates a short link, you generate a random code and check if it already exists in the database. One database query per attempt. At 1,000 URLs, this is fine — the query takes a millisecond, the index is tiny, nobody notices.</p> <p>At 100 million URLs, you're generating codes that collide more often (birthday paradox), each collision triggers another database round trip, and those round trips add up under high throughput. You're not slow because your code is bad — you're slow because you're asking the database a question it doesn't need to answer.</p> <p>What if you could check "does this code already exist?" without touching the database at all?</p> <h2> A Bit Array With an Attitude </h2> <p>A Bloom
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!